Análise das taxas de infecção e duração de cateteres de hemodiálise de curta e longa permanência em hospital de ensino
Analysis of infection rates and duration of short and long-term hemodialysis catheters in a teaching hospital
Seleno Glauber de Jesus-Silva; Jennifer dos Santos Oliveira; Karine Tobias França Ramos; Luciene Azevedo Morais; Melissa Andreia de Moraes Silva; Arturo Eduardo Krupa; Rodolfo Souza Cardoso
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Background: Short-term (ST) and long-term tunneled (LTT) central venous catheters for hemodialysis (CVCH) are critical for hemodialysis therapy. However, few studies have been conducted in Brazil to investigate the incidence of complications with these two types of catheters. Objectives: To analyze complications and duration of CVCH in a hemodialysis center at a teaching hospital. Methods: Single-center, longitudinal, and retrospective study of 115 consecutive patients undergoing hemodialysis catheter placement (67 ST and 48 LTT) over a 2-year period, analyzing overall survival, patency, loss of access, and incidence of complications. Results: Sixty percent of the patients were male and mean age was 62 years. The most common puncture site was the right internal jugular vein. Systemic arterial hypertension was present in 95% of cases. Median catheter in-place duration was 50 days (ST) vs. 112 days (LTT; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in overall survival. Incidence of catheter-related infection was higher in ST CVCH, with Staphylococcus sp. the microorganism most often found. The infection rate per 1000 days was higher in ST than in LTT catheters (16.7 events/1000 days vs. 7.0 events/1000 days). Low income was the only factor related to higher incidence of infection. Conclusions: The in-place duration of long-term catheters was significantly longer compared to short-term CVCH, but still below the values reported in the literature and without impact on overall survival. Low income was a factor associated with catheter infection.
Keywords
References
1 Ravani P, Palmer SC, Oliver MJ, et al. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(3):465-73.
2 Sesso RC, Lopes AA, Thomé FS, Lugon JR, Martins CT. Brazilian chronic dialysis survey 2016. J Bras Nefrol. 2017;39(3):261-6.
3 Grothe C, Belasco AGS, Bittencourt ARC, Vianna LAC, Sesso RCC, Barbosa DA. Incidência de infecção da corrente sanguÃnea nos pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise por cateter venoso central. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(1):73-80.
4 Böhlke M, Uliano G, Barcellos FC. Hemodialysis catheter-related infection: prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(5):347-55.
5 Bonfante GM, Gomes IC, Andrade EIG, Lima EM, Acurcio FA, Cherchiglia ML. Duration of temporary catheter use for hemodialysis: an observational, prospective evaluation of renal units in Brazil. BMC Nephrol. 2011;12(1):63.
6 Miller LM, Clark E, Dipchand C, et al. Hemodialysis tunneled catheter-related infections. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016;3. PMid:28270921.
7 Menegueti MG, Betoni NC, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Romão EA. Central venous catheter-related infections in patients receiving short-term hemodialysis therapy: incidence, associated factors, and microbiological aspects. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50(6):783-7.
8 Schwanke AA, Danski MTR, Pontes L, Kusma SZ, Lind J. Central venous catheter for hemodialysis: incidence of infection and risk factors. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(3):1115-21.
9 Ferreira V, Andrade D. Cateter para hemodiálise: retrato de uma realidade. Medicina (B Aires). 2007;40(4):582.
10 MartÃn-Peña A, Márquez RL, Guerrero MJM, et al. Tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections: a prospective multicenter cohort study from Spain. J Vasc Access. 2012;13(2):239-45.
11 Fram D, Okuno MFP, Taminato M, et al. Risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients at a Brazilian hemodialysis center: a case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):158.
12 Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2479-85.
13 Clark EG, Barsuk JH. Temporary hemodialysis catheters: recent advances. Kidney Int. 2014;86(5):888-95.
14 Shingarev R, Barker-Finkel J, Allon M. Natural history of tunneled dialysis catheters placed for hemodialysis initiation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(9):1289-94.
15 Engstrom BI, Horvath JJ, Stewart JK, et al. Tunneled internal jugular hemodialysis catheters: impact of laterality and tip position on catheter dysfunction and infection rates. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(9):1295-302.
16 Mandolfo S, Acconcia P, Bucci R, et al. Hemodialysis tunneled central venous catheters: five-year outcome analysis. J Vasc Access. 2014;15(6):461-5.
17 Shi M, Cui T, Ma L, Zhou L, Fu P. Catheter failure and mortality in hemodialysis patients with tunneled cuffed venous catheters in a single center. Blood Purif. 2017;43(4):321-6.
18 Hammarskjöld F, Berg S, Hanberger H, Taxbro K, Malmvall B-E. Sustained low incidence of central venous catheter-related infections over six years in a Swedish hospital with an active central venous catheter team. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(2):122-8.
19 Arhuidese IJ, Orandi BJ, Nejim B, Malas M. Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(4):1166-74.
20 Wang K, Wang P, Liang X, Lu X, Liu Z. Epidemiology of haemodialysis catheter complications: a survey of 865 dialysis patients from 14 haemodialysiscentres in Henan province in China. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e007136.
21 Mendu ML, May MF, Kaze AD, et al. Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):351.
22 Taylor G, Gravel D, Johnston L, Embil J, Holton D, Paton S. Incidence of bloodstream infection in multicenter inception cohorts of hemodialysis patients. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32(3):155-60.
23 Sahli F, Feidjel R, Laalaoui R. Hemodialysis catheter-related infection: rates, risk factors and pathogens. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10(4):403-8.
24 Murea M, James KM, Russell GB, et al. Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in elderly patients on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(4):764-70.
25 Esmanhoto CGU, Taminato MU, Fram DSU, Belasco AGSU, Barbosa DAU. Microrganismos isolados de pacientes em hemodiálise por cateter venoso central e evolução clÃnica relacionada. Acta Paul Enferm. 2013;26(5):413-20.
26 Zerati AE, Wolosker N, Luccia N, Puech-Leão P. Cateteres venosos totalmente implantáveis: histórico, técnica de implante e complicações. J Vasc Bras. 2017;16(2):128-39.
27 Barbosa DA, Gunji CK, Bittencourt ARC, et al. Co-morbidade e mortalidade de pacientes em inÃcio de diálise. Acta Paul Enferm. 2006;19(3):304-9.
28 Rosenberry PM, Niederhaus SV, Schweitzer EJ, Leeser DB. Decreasing dialysis catheter rates by creating a multidisciplinary dialysis access program. J Vasc Access. 2018;19(6):569-72.
29 Saleh HM, Tawfik MM, Abouellail H. Prospective, randomized study of long-term hemodialysis catheter removal versus guidewire exchange to treat catheter-related bloodstream infection. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(5):1427-1431.e1.
Submitted date:
11/06/2019
Accepted date:
04/24/2020
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email