Influência do sexo e da idade sobre o diâmetro da cava inferior e implicações para o implante de filtros de veia cava
Influence of sex and age on inferior vena cava diameter and implications for the implantation of vena cava filters
Ana Carolina Corrêa Franco; Lillian dos Santos Carneiro; Reinaldo Sérgio Monteiro Franco; Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes Junior
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Background: Measuring the venous diameter and choosing a compatible vena cava filter are essential to reduce the risk of complications resulting from implantation of these devices. However, there is little information on how the diameter of the inferior vena cava varies with sex and age. Objectives: To determine the influence of patients’ gender and age on their inferior vena cava diameter and the suitability of the different models of available filters. Methods: Retrospective analytical study based on computed tomography images. The diameter of the inferior vena cava was measured at 3 points: above the confluence of the common iliac veins, below the renal veins, and midway between these two points (cranial point, caudal point, and midpoint) using Arya® and Carestream PACS® software. The results were classified by sex and age groups. Results: CT scans of 417 patients were analyzed: 245 women and 172 men. The diameters at the midpoint and caudal point were, respectively, 19.1 mm and 20.6 mm in women from 81 to 92 years old and were statistically smaller (p< 0.05) when compared to women aged 19 to 40 years (midpoint: 22.7 mm; caudal point: 23 mm). Similar results were seen in men. Venous diameters at the cranial and caudal points in patients aged from 51 to 70 years were statistically larger in men (cranial point: 24.4 mm; caudal point:22.3 mm) than in women (cranial point: 22.6 mm; caudal point:20.8 mm) (p< 0.05). Conclusions: A smaller diameter was found for the inferior vena cava in older patients of both sexes and the rate of diameter change was similar among men and women.
Keywords
References
1 Rocha ATC, Pinheiro TB, Souza PRSP, Marques MA. Protocolos de profilaxia de tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) em hospitais brasileiros - PROTEV Brasil. J Vasc Bras. 2020;19:1-7.
2 Gomes AIM, Vidigal AS, Leite LDG, Alves GC, Souza TF, Santos NBD. COVID-19 e o seu efeito pró-trombótico: uso de trombolíticos no tratamento. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020;42:523.
3 Raymundo SRO, Lobo SMA, Hussain KMK, Hussein KG, Secches IT. O que mudou nas últimas décadas na profilaxia do tromboembolismo venoso em pacientes internados: artigo de revisão. J Vasc Bras. 2019;18:e20180021.
4 Curtarelli AE, Silva LPC, Camargo PAB, et al. Profilaxia de tromboembolismo venoso, podemos fazer melhor? Perfil de risco e profilaxia de tromboembolismo venoso em Hospital Universitário do interior do Estado de São Paulo. J Vasc Bras. 2019;18:18.
5 Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1023-6.
6 B. Braun. Peripheral Interventional Vascular Diagnosis & Therapy Catalog [Internet]. 2021 [citado 2021 maio 11].
7 Gregorio Ariza M, Tobio R, Carnevale F. Filtro de veia cava. In: Carnevale F, editor. Radiologia intervencionista e cirurgia endovascular. Rio de Janeiro: REVINTER Ltda.; 2006. p. 435-54.
8 Li X, Haddadin I, McLennan G, et al. Inferior vena cava filter - Comprehensive overview of current indications, techniques, complications and retrieval rates. Vasa. 2020;49(6):449-62.
9 Khan W, Zhang W, Clark V. Persistent abdominal pain as rare complication of duodenal perforation from an inferior vena cava filter. Cureus. 2021;13(2):e13168.
10 Chassin-Trubert L, Prouse G, Ozdemir BA, et al. Filter-Associated inferior vena cava thrombosis with duodenal perforation: case report and literature review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;58:383.e1-6.
11 Park HO, Choi JY, Jang IS, et al. Perforation of inferior vena cava and duodenum by strut of inferior vena cava filter. Medicine. 2019;98(47):e17835.
12 Krutman M, Yazbek G, Nishinari K, et al. An alternative approach to treatment of inferior vena cava filter perforation. J Vasc Bras. 2020;19:e20180131.
13 Sheth S, Fishman EK. Imaging of the inferior vena cava with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(5):1243-51.
14 Parikh A, Zhang J, Glaser J, Kalapatapu V. Symptomatic duodenal perforation by a Bird’s Nest vena cava filter. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020;7(1):104-7.
15 Masugata H, Senda S, Okuyama H, et al. Age-related decrease in inferior vena cava diameter measured with echocardiography. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;222(2):141-7.
16 Pixeon. PACS Aurora Arya. Versão 20.10.1 [software]. São Caetano do Sul: Pixeon; 2016.
17 Carestream Health. Carestream Vue PACS (Picture archiving communication system). Versão 12.1.5.0417 [software]. Rochester: Carestream; 2022.
18 Fontelles M. Métodos de amostragem. In: Fontelles M, editor. Bioestatística aplicada à pesquisa experimental. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Livraria da Física; 2012. p. 134-66.
19 Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft® Excel® para Microsoft 365 MSO 64 bits. Versão 16.0.14228.20216 [software]. Redmond: Microsoft; 2019.
20 Ayres M, Ayres M Jr, Ayres DL, Santos AS. BioEstat 5.0: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biomédicas. Versão 5.0 [software]. Maryland: Edição do autor; 2007.
21 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European respiratory society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543-603.
22 Bikdeli B, Chatterjee S, Desai NR, et al. Inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(13):1587-97.
23 Mobin-Uddin K, Mclean R, Bolooki H, Jude JR. Caval interruption for prevention of pulmonary embolism: long-term results of a new method. Arch Surg. 1969;99(6):711-5.
24 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – Anvisa. Consultas [Internet]. Brasília; 2022 [citado 2022 mar 26].
25 Góes AMO Jr, Albuquerque FBA, Beckmann FA, Centeno FV, Andrade MC, Vieira WB. Sexo e idade e sua influência sobre a anatomia da aorta abdominal e seus ramos. J Vasc Bras. 2020;19:e20200073.
26 Mikael LR, Paiva AMG, Gomes MM, et al. Envelhecimento vascular e rigidez arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(3):253-8. PMid:28678931.
27 Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Donato AJ, Galvan V, Csiszar A. Mechanisms of vascular aging. Circ Res. 2018;123(7):849-67.
28 Han S, Aydin MM, Akansel S, et al. Age-and sex-dependent alteration of functions and epigenetic modifications of vessel and endothelium related biomarkers. Turk J Biol. 2018;42(4):286-96.
29 Barodka VM, Joshi BL, Berkowitz DE, Hogue CW Jr, Nyhan D. Review article: implications of vascular aging. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(5):1048-60.
30 Hall JE, Guyton AC. Distensibilidade vascular e funçõesdos sistemas arterial e venoso. In: Hall JE, Guyton AC, editores. Tratado de fisiologia médica. 13ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2017. p. 177-86.
31 Presti C, Miranda F, Merlo I, et al. Insuficiência venosa crônica: diagnóstico e tratamento [Internet]. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular; 2015. 34 p. [citado 2021 jul 25].
32 Andreoli JM, Lewandowski RJ, Vogelzang RL, Ryu RK. Comparison of complication rates associated with permanent and retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a review of the MAUDE database. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(8):1181-5.
Submitted date:
08/23/2021
Accepted date:
07/15/2022
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email