Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
https://jvascbras.org/article/doi/10.1590/S1677-54492007000100003
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Original Article

Avaliação do modelo de predição clínica de Wells et al. no diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda dos membros inferiores

Evaluation of a clinical prediction model by Wells et al. in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs

Veronica Barreto Fortes; Hamilton Almeida Rollo; Archangelo Tarciso Fortes Jr.; Marcone de Lima Sobreira; Fernanda Cardoso Santos; Mariângela Giannini; Francisco Humberto de Abreu Maffei

Downloads: 0
Views: 936

Resumo

CONTEXTO: A aplicação de uma estratégia baseada em um modelo clínico associado ao mapeamento dúplex (MD) pode permitir um diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda (TVP) mais seguro, eficaz e custo-efetivo. OBJETIVO: Testar o modelo clínico de Wells et al. associado ao MD e verificar a ocorrência de TVP nos pacientes categorizados quanto à probabilidade de apresentar a doença, e determinar se, a partir dos resultados obtidos, seria possível reduzir o número de exames seriados com o MD. MÉTODOS: Os pacientes com suspeita clínica de TVP foram categorizados quanto à apresentação de TVP em baixa, moderada e alta probabilidade (BP, MP, AP) e, em seguida, submetidos ao MD. Pacientes com MD negativo repetiram o exame em 24-48 horas e em 7 dias. Pacientes com exame positivo para TVP foram tratados. Todos os pacientes sem TVP foram convocados para reavaliação clínica em 3 meses. RESULTADOS: A ocorrência de TVP entre os 489 pacientes avaliados foi de 39,1% (191), sendo 35,6% identificados no exame inicial e 3,5% no exame seriado. Os índices de pacientes que apresentaram TVP foram de 6,1% no grupo de BP, 26,9% no grupo de MP e 79,5% no grupo de AP. No exame seriado, o percentual de TVP foi de 2,4, 7,8 e 15,1% nos grupos BP, MP e AP, respectivamente. Dos pacientes com MD negativo, 62,4% compareceram após 3 meses, e piora dos sintomas foi apresentada por apenas um paciente. Neste, o MD mostrou TVP de veia poplítea. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados obtidos sugerem que, para os pacientes com BP para TVP e MD negativo, seria possível prescindir do exame seriado, devido à baixa ocorrência de TVP neste grupo, tornando, assim, a abordagem diagnóstica mais simples.

Palavras-chave

Trombose venosa, diagnóstico, ultra-som

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of a diagnostic strategy based on a clinical model associated with duplex scanning (DS) may allow for a safer and more effective/cost-effective diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical model proposed by Wells et al. associated with DS and verify the occurrence of DVT in patients divided into probability of presenting the disease, and assess the possibility of reducing the number of repeated DS based on the results obtained. METHODS: Suspected DVT patients were accordingly categorized into groups of low, moderate and high DVT probability (LP, MP and HP). The patients were then submitted to DS and those without DVT were rescheduled to repeat the examination in 24-48 hours and in 7 days. Patients positively diagnosed with DVT received proper treatment. All patients without DVT were summoned to return within 3 months. RESULTS: The incidence of DVT among all 489 patients was 39.1% (191); of these, 35.6% were identified in the first examination and 3.5% in the follow-up. Among patients categorized as LP the occurrence was 6.1%, 26.9% in the MP group and 79.5% in the HP group. On the follow-up exams the incidence of DVT in LP, MP and HP groups was 2.4, 7.8 e 13.2%, respectively. Among patients with negative DS, 62.4% attended the reevaluation in 3 months and only one presented worsening of symptoms. This patient was then diagnosed with popliteal DVT using DS. CONCLUSION:The results suggest that for patients with LP for DVT and negative DS, follow-up exams are not needed, since the occurrence of DVT was low in this group. This procedure simplifies the diagnostic process.

Keywords

Venous thrombosis, diagnosis, ultrasonics

References

Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996;93:2212-45.

Hirsh J, Raschke R, Warkentin TE, Dalen JE, Deykin D, Poller L. Heparin: mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy and safety. Chest. 1995;108(^s4):258S-75S.

Cogo A, Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2777-80.

Cogo A, Lensing AW, Koopman MM. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1998;316:17-20.

Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:663-77.

Wolf B, Nichols DM, Duncan JL. Safety of a single duplex scan to exclude deep venous thrombosis. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1525-8.

Hirsh J, Lee A. How we diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis. Blood. 2002;99:3102-10.

Anderson DR, Wells PS, Stiell I. Thrombosis in the emergency department: use of a clinical diagnosis model to safely avoid the need for urgent radiological investigation. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:477-82.

Tick LW, Ton E, van Voorthuizen T. Practical diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and D-dimer test. Am J Med. 2002;113:630-5.

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997;350:1795-8.

Zar JH. More on dichotomous variables. Biostatistical analysis. 1999:516-65.

Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1995;345:1326-30.

Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353:190-5.

Miron MJ, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Clinical assessment of suspected deep vein thrombosis: comparison between a score and empirical assessment. J Intern Med. 2000;247:249-54.

Dryjski M, O'Brien-Irr MS, Harris LM, Hassett J, Janicke D. Evaluation of a screening protocol to exclude the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis among emergency department patients. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:1010-5.

Heit JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Lohse CM. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients vs community residents. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:1102-10.

Rollo HA, Lastoria S, Yoshida WB. Mapeamento dúplex no diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda dos membros inferiores. Programa Oficial do 32 Congresso Brasileiro de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular. 1997:120.

Mattos MA, Melendres G, Sumner DS. Prevalence and distribution of calf vein thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a color-flow duplex study. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:738-44.

Souza E. Validação de modelo de predição clínica para o diagnóstico de trombose venosa profunda dos membros inferiores. 2001.

Haeger K. Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis. I: The interpretation of signs and symptoms. . 1969;20:219-23.

Richards KL, Armstrong JD Jr., Tikoff G, Hershgold EJ, Booth JL, Rampton JB. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 1976;136:1091-6.

Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR. A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography: potential for an improvement in the diagnostic process. J Intern Med. 1998;243:15-23.

Kakkar VV, Howe CT, Flanc C, Clarke MB. Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1969;2:230-2.

Lagerstedt CI, Olsson CG, Fagher BO, Oqvist BW, Albrechtsson U. Need for long-term anticoagulant treatment in symptomatic calf-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1985;2:515-8.

Cogo A, Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2777-80.

Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)"> Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)">
5ddfe0070e8825ba364ce1d5 jvb Articles
Links & Downloads

J Vasc Bras

Share this page
Page Sections