Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
https://jvascbras.org/article/doi/10.1590/S1677-54492011000300005
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Artigo Original

Infecção de corrente sanguínea relacionada a cateter venoso central (ICSRC) em enfermarias: estudo prospectivo comparativo entre veia subclávia e veia jugular interna

Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CA-BSI) in wards: a prospective comparative study between subclavian and jugular access

Gustavo Lopes Gomes Siqueira; Walkiria Hueb; Rodrigo Contreira; Maria Aparecida Nogueron; Daniela Muniz Cancio; Roberto Augusto Caffaro

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492011000300005 J Vasc Bras, vol.10, n3, p.211-216, 2011
PDF Português
PDF English
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 1258

Resumo

CONTEXTO: Hemocultura positiva associada a cateter venoso central tem sido estudada em unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI), mas ainda é controverso se o acesso jugular tem maior incidência de complicações infecciosas que o acesso na veia subclávia. OBJETIVO: Comparar índice de infecção entre os acessos na jugular interna e os na veia subclávia em pacientes internados nas enfermarias de cirurgia. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo, descritivo e comparativo com 114 cateteres em 96 pacientes admitidos nas enfermarias de cirurgia de um Hospital Quaternário, tendo como variáveis o local de inserção, número de lumens, tempo de uso, comparando-os com o índice de complicações infecciosas. RESULTADOS: O índice de infecção foi de 9,64% (11 cateteres), sem significância estatística quando comparados o número de lumens (mono versus duplo) e infecção (p=0,274); também sem significância estatística a comparação entre o tempo de uso (>14 dias) e infecção (p=0,156). Comparando os acessos jugular e subclávia, encontramos significância estatística tendo infecção em 17,2% na subclávia e 1,8% na jugular, com p=0,005. Índice de Hemocultura positivo associado a cateter venoso central foi maior no acesso subclávia quando comparado com jugular interna, com OR 11,2, IC95% (1,4-90,9; p=0,023). CONCLUSÕES: O acesso venoso central na jugular interna tem menor risco de infecção se comparado com subclávia em enfermarias.

Palavras-chave

cateterismo venoso central, infecção hospitalar, bacteriemia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive hemoculture associated with central venous catheters has been studied in intensive care units (ICU), but is still controversial if the internal jugular vein access has a higher incidence of infection than subclavian or femoral vein access. OBJECTIVE: To compare catheter-related bloodstream infection (CABSI) rates between internal jugular and subclavian vein access in patients admitted to surgical wards. METHODS: This is a prospective, descriptive and comparative study of 114 central venous catheters placed in 96 patients admitted to the surgical wards of a tertiary-care hospital. The following parameters were studied: local of insertion of the catheter (internal jugular versus subclavian), number of lumens (single versus double) and duration of use (longer or shorter than 14 days), in order to determine their influence in CABSI rates. RESULTS: The CABSI rate was 9,64% (11 catheters), with no significant statistical differences regarding the number of lumens (p=0.274), and duration of use (p=0.156). The CABSI rate was higher in the subclavian vein than in the internal jugular vein access (OR 11.2, 95%CI 1.4-90.8; p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The internal jugular vein access has a lesser incidence of CABSI than subclavian vein access in patients admitted to surgical wards.

Keywords

catheterization, central venous, cross infection, bacteremia

Referências

Richards M, Edwards J, Culver D, Gaynes R. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2000;21(8):510-15.

Rosenthal V, Guzman S, Pezzotto S, Crnich C. Effect of an infection control program using education and performance feedback on rates of intravascular device-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Argentina. Am J Infect Control.. 2003;31(7):405-9.

Orsi G, Di Stefano L, Noah N. Hospital-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection: increased hospital stay and direct costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(4):190-7.

Safdar N, Kluger DM, Maki DG. A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies. Medicine. 2002;81(6):466-79.

Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, Lefrant JY, Raffy B, Barre E. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286(6):700-7.

O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control.. 2002;30(8):476-89.

Marschall J, Leone C, Jones M, Nihill D, Fraser VJ, Warren DK. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in general medical patients outside the intensive care unit: a surveillance study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2007;28(8):905-9.

Vonberg RP, Behnke M, Geffers C, Sohr D, Ruden H, Dettenkofer M. Device-associated infection rates for non-intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2006;27(4):357-61.

Trick WE, Vernon MO, Welbel SF, Wisniewski MF, Jernigan JA, Weinstein RA. Unnecessary use of central venous catheters: the need to look outside the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2004;25(3):266-8.

Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcala L, Perez MJ, Rincón C, Muñoz P. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for diagnosis of Catheter-Related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;44:820-6.

Climo M, Diekema D, Warren DK, Herwaldt LA, Perl TM, Peterson L. Prevalence of the use of central venous access devices within and outside of the intensive care unit: results of a survey among hospitals in the prevention epicenter program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2003;24(12):942-5.

Goetz AM, Wagener MM, Miller JM, Muder RR. Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 1998;19(11):842-5.

Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G, Andremont A, Buu-Hoi A, Ourbak P. Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter culture in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol.. 1990;28(11):2520-5.

Moro ML, Vigano EF, Cozzi Lepri A. Risk factors for central venous catheter-related infections in surgical and intensive care units: The Central Venous Catheter Related Infections Study Group. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 1994;15(4):253-64.

Sadoyama G, Gontijo Filho PP. Comparison between the jugular and subclavian vein as insertion site for central venous catheters: microbiological aspects and risk factors for colonization and infection. Braz J Infect Dis.. 2003;7(2):142-8.

Bernard RW, Stahl WM. Subclavian vein catheterizations: A prospective study: I. Noninfectious complications. Ann Surg.. 1971;173(2):184-90.

Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G, Andremont A, Buu-Hoi A, Ourbak P. Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol.. 1990;28(11):2520-25.

Norwood S, Wilkins HE 3rd, Vallina VL, Fernandez LG, McLarty JW. The safety of prolonging the use of central venous catheters: a prospective analysis of the effects of using antiseptic-bonded catheters with daily site care. Crit Care Med.. 2000;28(5):1376-82.

Corona ML, Peters SG, Narr BJ, Thompson RL. Infections related to central venous catheters. Mayo Clin Proc.. 1990;65(7):979-86.

Deshpande KS, Hatem C, Ulrich HL, Currie BP, Aldrich TK, Bryan-Brown CW, Kvetan V. The incidence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites in an intensive care unit population. Crit Care Med.. 2005;33(1):13-20; discussion 234-5.

Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care.. 2005;9(6):R631-5.

Mnatzaganian G, Galai N, Sprung CL, Zitser-Gurevich Y, Mandel M, Ben-Hur D. Increased risk of bloodstream and urinary infections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared with patients fitting ICU admission criteria treated in regular wards. J Hosp Infect.. 2005;59(4):331-42.

Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)"> Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)">
5dded3b70e8825a2547279a1 jvb Articles
1677-7301 (Eletrônico)
J Vasc Bras ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

J Vasc Bras

Share this page
Page Sections